Showing posts with label boarding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label boarding. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Analysis of Airplane Boarding Times
Analysis of Airplane Boarding Times
Abstract
We model and analyze the process of passengers boarding an airplane. We show how
the model yields closed-form estimates for the expected boarding time in many cases of
interest. The computations reveal a clear link between the e ciency of various airline
boarding policies and interior airplane design parameters, such as distance between rows.
Comparison of our results with previous work, based on discrete event simulations, shows
a high degree of agreement. Our work thus provides an explanation and theoretical
foundation for these previous results, while allowing greater
exibility in terms of exploring
many parameter settings.
http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~ebachmat/managesubmit.pdf
Most Annoying Airline Delays Might Just Be in the Boarding
By JAD MOUAWAD
Published: October 31, 2011
It’s the common tale of woe for many travelers waiting to board a plane. First the airline has to go through a long list of passengers who have priority: First- and business-class passengers, frequent fliers, elite card holders, uniformed members of the military, families with children, those who hold credit cards affiliated with the airlines, passengers who paid for priority seats.
By the time coach travelers are called, the overhead bins seem to be already full.
Airlines have been boarding passengers since the first commercial flight, but as they have added new classes of seating to their cabins and new fees for priority boarding — all in the name of more revenue — they have slowed down the whole process.
Checked-baggage fees have only added to the problem, because travelers now take more roll-ons onboard, blocking the aisles as they try to cram their belongings into any available space.
And that’s not to mention the fact that planes are now fuller.
That is why some airlines have gone back to the drawing board to rein in a lengthening process. As it is, boarding time has doubled over the last decades, according to research by Boeing. It now takes 30 to 40 minutes to board about 140 passengers on a domestic flight, up from around 15 minutes in the 1970s.
“They should have a different line for people with carry-ons like they do at baseball games with bags,” said Brian Proffit, who was flying to Houston from New York with Delta Air Lines. “The boarding process has become worse than the security lanes.”
One airline did figure out a way to sharply cut boarding time. Spirit Airlines found that passengers got to their seats much more rapidly once it started charging $20 to $40 per carry-on bag. Since it’s $2 cheaper to check a bag, more passengers do, and Spirit claims its “stress-free boarding” saves six minutes on average.
Others are reluctant to take such a drastic step for fear of alienating customers.
It should be no surprise that boarding has become one more frustrating step in airline travel. Or, as Mark E. DuPont, the vice president for airport services planning at American Airlines, put it: “Boarding can be like driving behind a slow-moving truck that you can’t overtake.”
Airlines have tried all kinds of elaborate tricks over the years to leave the gate on time. Some board passengers in the back rows first, while others give priority to those with window seats, and some come up with elaborate combinations, including one no longer used, known as the “reverse pyramid.”
But passengers can be unpredictable.
“The real world has wrecked their optimization plans,” said Matthew Daimler, the founder of SeatGuru, a Web site that helps passengers find the best seats on a particular plane.
American Airlines changed the way it boarded its planes in May. It still gives priority to business passengers and frequent fliers but then boards passengers who paid an extra $9 to $19 to get on early, guaranteeing they will find space to stow their bags.
The rest of the passengers are then brought in as three groups, sorted in an attempt to spread them out more evenly through the cabin and allow more people to find their seats faster. The approach also helps passengers stow their luggage more efficiently, nearer to their seats, allowing more people to find overhead space and cutting the number of bags that need to be checked at the last minute — a common cause of delayed flights.
The new method has cut boarding by four to five minutes, Mr. DuPont said.
All the extra fees have been a major benefit to the airlines’ bottom lines. According to estimates by Amadeus, a global distribution service, they will add up to $12.5 billion in 2011 for major United States airlines, up 87 percent from last year.
The challenge of boarding is thornier for narrow-body planes with single aisles that are used on domestic flights than on the larger planes on international flights where passengers have two possible pathways.
A scientist once said the problem of boarding a single-aisle plane was a real-life application of Einstein’s theory of relativity, where passengers are constrained in their movements through space and time.
A few years ago, Jason H. Steffen, an astrophysicist at Fermilab in Chicago, figured there had to be a better way to board after he was held up on the jetway while waiting for a flight to Washington. “If the process was efficient, there would be no line,” he said.
He set out to solve the problem using a “Markov chain Monte Carlo optimization algorithm” — a mathematical program well suited to the kind of haphazard events that occur in an airplane cabin. Much to his surprise, he found that the common back-to-front method was among the slowest: passengers must wait for those ahead of them to stow their bags and sit down. It is far better, it turns out, to let passengers board randomly. Mr. Steffen claims he found the fastest way, which involves boarding passengers from the back who are seated two rows apart.
“The lesson I learned comes down to this: you want to spread passengers out and not concentrate them while boarding,” he said. But the method is unlikely to be picked up because the airlines say it is too complicated.
Others have also searched for the holy grail of boarding. In 2002, America West Airlines, which later merged with US Airways, hired industrial engineers from Arizona State University to speed up the boarding process. The group came up with an approach that they called the “reverse pyramid.” It begins with passengers assigned to window seats in the back, and gradually makes its way to the front of the plane in a staggered pattern.
That saved time, but US Airways dropped it in 2007 because some passengers without elite status sitting in the front could not find space for their bags.
“Overhead space has really become a premium product,” said Kerry Hester, the senior vice president for operations planning at US Airways.
Another approach is used by Southwest, which says it can board its planes in around 15 minutes. It says the root of the delays is the practice of assigning seat numbers. Southwest’s passengers are instead assigned to one of three boarding groups, and then given a number based on the time they checked in.
Passengers who buy a premium “Business Select” ticket are guaranteed to board ahead of everyone, followed by Southwest frequent fliers and passengers who bought a $10 one-way “early-bird check-in” pass.
The airlines, meanwhile, keeps looking for what Scott O’Leary, managing director of customer experience at United, described as “the sweet spot between speed and a sense of order.”
A version of this article appeared in print on November 1, 2011, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Most Annoying Airline Delays Might Just Be in the Boarding.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/business/airlines-are-trying-to-cut-boarding-times-on-planes.html?pagewanted=all
Comparing Airplane Boarding Methods
Group/Zone Boarding
Boarding Systems
See http://menkes76.com/projects/boarding/boarding.htm for videos of animations
Monday, September 5, 2011
Experimental test of airplane boarding methods
Experimental test of airplane boarding methods
Jason H. Steen
Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics, Batavia, IL
Jon Hotchkiss
Hotchkiss Industries, Sherman Oaks, CA
Abstract
We report the results of an experimental comparison of dierent airplane boarding methods. This test was conducted
in a mock 757 fuselage, located on a Southern California soundstage, with 12 rows of six seats and a single aisle.
Five methods were tested using 72 passengers of various ages. We found a significant reduction in the boarding times
of optimized methods over traditional methods. These improved methods, if properly implemented, could result in a
significant savings to airline companies.
<iframe src="http://docs.google.com/gview?url=http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1108/1108.5211v1.pdf&embedded=true" style="width:590px; height:500px;" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Jason H. Steen
Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics, Batavia, IL
Jon Hotchkiss
Hotchkiss Industries, Sherman Oaks, CA
Abstract
We report the results of an experimental comparison of dierent airplane boarding methods. This test was conducted
in a mock 757 fuselage, located on a Southern California soundstage, with 12 rows of six seats and a single aisle.
Five methods were tested using 72 passengers of various ages. We found a significant reduction in the boarding times
of optimized methods over traditional methods. These improved methods, if properly implemented, could result in a
significant savings to airline companies.
<iframe src="http://docs.google.com/gview?url=http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1108/1108.5211v1.pdf&embedded=true" style="width:590px; height:500px;" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Please be seated
THE job of the professional astrophysicist is to contemplate the
music of the spheres. Given the global nature of modern science,
however, today’s astrophysicists often spend just as much time
confronting the cacophony of the airport. Now, one of them has devised a
way to make that experience a little less tedious. Jason Steffen, from
Fermilab, near Chicago, has designed and experimentally tested a faster
method of boarding aeroplanes. By his calculation, it could save
airlines hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
Dr Steffen spends his time thinking about such things as extrasolar planets, dark matter and cosmology. After waiting in a particularly long queue to board a flight, though, he began to harbour an interest in the mechanics of getting people on to planes. In 2008 he wrote a computer simulation to test different methods. Using a numerical technique familiar to him from his day job, he was able to find what looked like the best. He has put his answer to the test, and the results have just been submitted for publication to the Journal of Air Transport Management.
According to Dr Steffen, two things bog down the boarding process.
The first is that passengers are often forced to wait in the aisle while
those ahead of them stow their luggage and then get out of the way. The
second is that passengers already seated in aisle or middle seats often
have to get up and move into the aisle to let others take seats nearer
the window. Dr Steffen’s proposal minimises the former type of
disturbance and eliminates the latter.
In the Steffen method, passengers are boarded by seat type (ie, window, middle or aisle) while also ensuring that neighbours in the boarding queue are seated in alternating rows. First, the window seats for every other row on one side of the plane are boarded. Next, alternate rows of window seats on the opposite side are boarded. Then, the window seats in the skipped rows are filled in on each side. The procedure then repeats with the middle seats and the aisles.
By boarding alternate rows in this way, passengers are spaced far enough apart along the aisle to stow their luggage in parallel, all at the same time. Because passengers in the same seat types board together, they do not have to step over each other to swap seats.
To test the idea, Dr Steffen conducted a test using passengers and a mock Boeing 757 fuselage. The fuselage had a single aisle and 12 rows. Seventy-two passengers (including families with children) boarded, towing their bags and roll-aboard suitcases. In addition to the Steffen method, the team tried boarding in a strict back-to-front order, block boarding (the system now used by most airlines, with passengers assigned to groups within the cabin) and boarding in random order (which made its debut at American Airlines earlier this summer).
Standard block boarding turned out to be the slowest way to do things, taking almost seven minutes to fill the 12 rows. Dr Steffen’s system took half that time. Indeed, it was the fastest performing of the methods tested. With full-sized planes, the benefit should increase, as more people can stow their luggage simultaneously along the longer aisles.
Although Dr Steffen admits that the airline industry has shown no interest in his method so far, he points out that, in principle, there should be no barriers to its adoption. Though directing airline passengers on to a plane is a little like herding cats some airlines, such as Southwest, already try to get their passengers to line up in a certain order before boarding. If travellers believed that complying with the new arrangements really would make their lives easier, they would probably do so. And by Dr Steffen’s calculations, airlines have a pretty strong incentive to persuade them. Previous work has shown that every minute a plane spends at the terminal costs $30. Assuming the average carrier runs 1,500 flights a day, saving as little as six minutes per flight would add up to $100m a year. For hard-pressed airlines running on razor-thin margins, that really would be astronomical.
http://www.economist.com/node/21528218
Dr Steffen spends his time thinking about such things as extrasolar planets, dark matter and cosmology. After waiting in a particularly long queue to board a flight, though, he began to harbour an interest in the mechanics of getting people on to planes. In 2008 he wrote a computer simulation to test different methods. Using a numerical technique familiar to him from his day job, he was able to find what looked like the best. He has put his answer to the test, and the results have just been submitted for publication to the Journal of Air Transport Management.
In the Steffen method, passengers are boarded by seat type (ie, window, middle or aisle) while also ensuring that neighbours in the boarding queue are seated in alternating rows. First, the window seats for every other row on one side of the plane are boarded. Next, alternate rows of window seats on the opposite side are boarded. Then, the window seats in the skipped rows are filled in on each side. The procedure then repeats with the middle seats and the aisles.
By boarding alternate rows in this way, passengers are spaced far enough apart along the aisle to stow their luggage in parallel, all at the same time. Because passengers in the same seat types board together, they do not have to step over each other to swap seats.
To test the idea, Dr Steffen conducted a test using passengers and a mock Boeing 757 fuselage. The fuselage had a single aisle and 12 rows. Seventy-two passengers (including families with children) boarded, towing their bags and roll-aboard suitcases. In addition to the Steffen method, the team tried boarding in a strict back-to-front order, block boarding (the system now used by most airlines, with passengers assigned to groups within the cabin) and boarding in random order (which made its debut at American Airlines earlier this summer).
Standard block boarding turned out to be the slowest way to do things, taking almost seven minutes to fill the 12 rows. Dr Steffen’s system took half that time. Indeed, it was the fastest performing of the methods tested. With full-sized planes, the benefit should increase, as more people can stow their luggage simultaneously along the longer aisles.
Although Dr Steffen admits that the airline industry has shown no interest in his method so far, he points out that, in principle, there should be no barriers to its adoption. Though directing airline passengers on to a plane is a little like herding cats some airlines, such as Southwest, already try to get their passengers to line up in a certain order before boarding. If travellers believed that complying with the new arrangements really would make their lives easier, they would probably do so. And by Dr Steffen’s calculations, airlines have a pretty strong incentive to persuade them. Previous work has shown that every minute a plane spends at the terminal costs $30. Assuming the average carrier runs 1,500 flights a day, saving as little as six minutes per flight would add up to $100m a year. For hard-pressed airlines running on razor-thin margins, that really would be astronomical.
http://www.economist.com/node/21528218
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
The Plane Truth: Boarding by Rows Is the Worst Possible Way, Says Physicist
Let’s face it: boarding an airplane with luggage is just downright frustrating. Not only do you have to puzzle out how you are going to wrestle your carry-on bag into the aircraft’s tiny overhead compartment, but you have to do it while trying not to get swept away by the tugging current of other passengers.

Courtesy of Steffen, arXiv
Steffen timed how long it took the passengers to fill the plane under the different boarding procedures and found that the block style takes the longest, falling well behind the uber-sophisticated “random boarding” method—letting everyone on at the same time. The Steffen method was the quickest because it maximized the number of people who could use the aisle concurrently without crashing into each other.
So, Steffen argues, if airline companies started implementing his method, they could save money by shortening the amount of time the planes have spend in the terminal. But can you imagine how long it would take to get people to line up in the correct order in the first place?
Reference: J. Steffen and J. Hotchkiss. Experimental test of airplane boarding methods. arXiv:1108.5211v1
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/08/29/the-plane-truth-boarding-by-rows-is-the-worst-possible-way-says-physicist/
How to cut boarding time in HALF
<iframe width="420" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/o9-XjEI8VmA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
http://www.rdhub.com/?p=7236
Boarding a plane is a completely
miserable, time-consuming experience. How often are you left waiting for
that oversized man jam his oversized luggage into the undersized
overhead compartment? Ridiculous! That’s why every airline needs to try
this new boarding method. It cuts the time in half.
Amazingly, it was invented by Dr. Jason
Steffen, an astrophysicist in his day job but a man more adept at
running airplanes than the airlines themselves. In his method, window
seats on alternate rows on one side of the plane boards first. Then
alternating window seats on the other side. Then alternating middle
seats on the original side, then alternating middle seats on the other
side. And then on and on and on until the plane is filled. Watch the
video, you’ll see a perfectly choreographed dance that maximizes aisle
space and overhead compartments.
Steffen figured out this method using the Monte Carlo optimization method
and promises that it can cut boarding time in half. It won’t cure the
ineptitude of airlines in other areas but it can make air travel less of
a pain in the ass. Delta? United? American? JetBlue? Virgin America?
Who’s in? [WBEZ via Consumerist]
http://www.rdhub.com/?p=7236
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)